Referenza su Effetto di trematoci su conchiglia

Questo forum raccoglie tutto ciò che non abbiamo previsto negli altri....
come la rubrica delle "Misure Record"

Moderatori: Paolo Russo, Domenico Capua, Walter Renda, Agatino Reitano, Gabriele Macrì

Rispondi
Giambattista Bello
Messaggi: 29
Iscritto il: venerdì 28 giugno 2013, 17:56

Referenza su Effetto di trematoci su conchiglia

Messaggio da Giambattista Bello »

Cari Amici,
vi trasmetto la referenza e l'abstract di un articolo appena uscito che potrebbe interessare qualcuno di voi.
Cordialmente, GB

Effects of trematode parasitism on the shell morphology of snails from flow and nonflow environments

Kyle D. Gustafson* and Matthew G. Bolek

Journal of Morphology
Volume 277, Issue 3, pages 316–325, March 2016

ABSTRACT
The primary function of the gastropod shell is protection. However, shells that function well in one environment may be maladaptive in another. Upon infection, the snail shell protects internal parasites and it is to the parasite's advantage to optimize, or not interfere with, shell functionality. However, parasites, particularly trematodes, are often pathogenic and it is not clear if parasitism will induce environment-dependent or -independent changes to gastropod shells. We conducted a field study and a complementary laboratory experiment to examine the effects of trematode parasitism on shell characteristics (shape, size, and crush resistance) of Physa acuta snails in flow and nonflow environments using geometric morphometrics and crush assays. Field results indicate wetland (nonflow) snails had large, crush resistant shells with narrow apertures and tall spires. In contrast, stream (flow) snails had small, weak shells with wide apertures and short spires. Parasitism had no apparent effect on the crush resistance of wetland snails but significantly reduced the crush resistance of stream snails. Parasitism had no significant effect on overall shell shape in stream or wetland snails. Similar to the results of our field study, nonflow tank snails had significantly more crush resistant shells than flow tank snails. Additionally, the shapes of flow and nonflow tank snails significantly differed where nonflow tank snails resembled wetland snails and flow tank snails resembled stream snails. For laboratory snails, parasitism reduced crush resistance regardless of flow/nonflow treatment. Our results demonstrate that habitat and/or flow treatment was the primary factor affecting P. acuta shell morphology and that trematode parasitism played a secondary role.
Rispondi